ABSTRACT
Early identification of PNH, a rare life-threatening disease is essential to ensure appropriate management via the UK PNH service. Since testing for PNH is expensive (75.97 per test), we set out to assess the suitability of PNH requests against guidelines with the aim to feedback to colleagues and reduce unnecessary testing. To determine whether PNH requests at UHNM were in line with criteria in British Society for Haematology (BSH) guidelines. All patients over 18 years of age who had PNH testing for the first time and those who had repeat testing for monitoring between 01/04/2019 and 31/03/2020 were included. Patients were selected from electronic records of PNH sample receipt to laboratories. Hospital records were reviewed for clinical details and investigation Results. 82 requests including 79 individual patients were audited. 57% were male and 43% were female. Median age was 56 years. 97.6% of PNH tests were requested by a haematologist whilst only 2.5% requests were done by non-haematology clinicians. 52.4% requests were in keeping with BSH recommendations, whilst 47.6% tests did not meet criteria for testing. All patients tested outside of guideline recommendations were negative. Of the reasonable requests, only 23.3% (10) were positive. Of the PNH positive patients, 8 patients were known to have a PNH clone with aplastic anaemia;one patient had a hypoplastic bone marrow and a known PNH clone whilst only one patient with cytopenia had a new positivity for PNH. The frequency monitoring for aplastic anaemia and a PNH clone was 100% concordant with BSH recommendations. With appropriate testing, only one new patient was identified. Our audit has limitations. We have not been able to assess whether any patients outside of those monitored for PNH in aplastic anaemia have been overlooked for testing. Also, the time period includes the COVID-19 pandemic so our findings may not reflect usual practice. New BSH guidelines for thrombophilia testing were published in 2022 and recommend testing for PNH in patients with thrombosis at unusual sites and abnormal haematological parameters and for patients with arterial thrombosis and abnormal blood parameters. This will likely limit excess tests although the sensitivity and specificity of such an approach has not been formally evaluated. In a finite health system, it is our responsibility to rationalise investigations. The cost of a year's testing was 6229.54 and that of inappropriate testing was 2962.83. As a department, we could, therefore, save 2962.83.
ABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about patients’ interactions with Supported Self-Management (SSM) for early breast cancer (EBC), or confidence in managing their care in this pathway. The PRAGMATIC study allowed us to explore these issues. Methods: Three clinical teams in Surrey and Sussex identified EBC patients due to enter SSM. Patients completed standardised questionnaires (separately reported) +/- semi-structured telephone interviews at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The interviews explored how confident patients felt managing their care, accessing services, managing side effects (SEs), and lifestyle changes. Results: 32/110 patients engaged in interviews;data are available for 30/32 at all timepoints. Participants were representative of the whole group in terms of demographics and treatment received. Patients understood the main reasons for SSM were to: a) assume responsibility for their follow up (18/32;56%) and b) save time and money for them and the hospital (16/32;50%). Most maintained (very/somewhat) confidence over time in managing their care and SEs, but were less confident identifying BC related signs/symptoms especially if screen detected. 19 patients contacted the SSM helpline +/- their GP. 15/19 found the helpline easy to use and 6/19 were seen by a healthcare professional. The main triggers for calling were for advice on signs/symptoms and managing SEs. 5/26 (19%) patients on endocrine therapy (ET) had stopped it completely. Most (29/32) were engaged in exercise before diagnosis, and 8/10 who discontinued during treatment resumed afterwards. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on exercise and socialising. The interviews’ free text provided a plethora of rich data. Qualitative analysis produced four overarching themes: 1) expectations and experiences, 2) emotional wellbeing, 3) clinical concerns, and 4) effect of COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: SSM works for most EBC patients. Clinicians could explain that the helpline is available for psychosocial as well as physical concerns. BC teams may want to review how to help screen detected patients recognise BC related signs/symptoms, how to monitor adherence to ET and offer interventions for treatment related SEs. Clinical trial identification: ISRCTN10777283. Legal entity responsible for the study: University of Sussex. Funding: Surrey & Sussex Cancer Alliance. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 outbreak has rapidly progressed into a worldwide pandemic, and the need for social distancing has changed the way we learn and work. Our monthly OMFS journal club has been no different, and is currently meeting on the video conferencing application Microsoft Teams. The use of a virtual setting for training in medicine and dentistry is not new and, as in the case of our recent move to a virtual medium, it may be that COVID-19 has fast-tracked this digital transformation. There are of course disadvantages to online teaching that traditional face-to-face teaching overcomes. We conducted a survey to examine how trainees' attitudes and experiences have altered with this change, and to understand whether some elements of this new style of training may be advantageous in the post-pandemic world. We aimed to assess trainees' attitudes towards online teaching, and which elements, if any, would be beneficial once face-to-face teaching becomes possible again. A survey was created for all trainees taking part in journal club meetings at Bradford Teaching Hospitals. Multiple-choice and Likert scale questions were designed to ascertain the differences in experience between online and face-to-face settings. A Wilcoxon matched pairs signed test was used to analyse the results. Responses were kept anonymous. Results showed that the majority of trainees found it easier to attend the online journal club, and also indicated that the most found Microsoft Teams easy to use, though we did not have another online application for comparison. There was no significant difference in participation comfort between the two settings, though trainees felt that the online setting considerably improved learning effectiveness. Furthermore, 79% (11/14) thought that online tutorials and meetings should replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the future. The use of internet technology such as video conferencing is not new, and although journal clubs are typically held in academic institutions, online and virtual clubs are flourishing. With an array of advantages, there is no shying away from the trend to move our teaching to a virtual medium. COVID-19 may have just provided the stimulus that has forced this transformation to accelerate.